Wikipedia

Double demotivation

Double demotivation is a theory involving pay and motivation first postulated by S.C. Carr and MacLachlan. Double demotivation hypothesises that pay discrepancies decrease work motivation among both lower and higher paid individuals who essentially perform the same task. Compared with equitably paid workers, employees who felt they were being under- or overpaid reported lower job satisfaction and greater readiness to change jobs.

See also

  • Melvin J. Lerner's just world theory
  • J Stacy Adams' equity theory
  • Work psychology

References

  • Carr S.C., McLoughlin D, .Hodgson M., MacLachlan M (1996) Effects of unreasonable pay discrepancies for under- and overpayment on double demotivation. Genetic and Social General Psychology Monographs. Nov;122(4):475-94.
  • McLoughlin, D. and S.C. Carr (1997), Equity Sensitivity and Double De-motivation, Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 668-70.
  • MacLachlan, M. and Carr, S.C. (2005) The Human Dynamics of Aid. Policy Insights, OECD Development Centre, 10, June. Online at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/56/35041556.pdf, accessed on 10 August 2006.
  • Carr, S. C., Hodgson, M. R., and Vent, D. H. (2004) Pay Diversity Across Work Groups: A Doubly De-Motivating Influence? Journal of Management Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 5. (May 2005), 417-439.
  • http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v3n2/justworld.html
This article is copied from an article on Wikipedia® - the free encyclopedia created and edited by its online user community. The text was not checked or edited by anyone on our staff. Although the vast majority of Wikipedia® encyclopedia articles provide accurate and timely information, please do not assume the accuracy of any particular article. This article is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License.

Copyright © 2003-2025 Farlex, Inc Disclaimer
All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.