Wikipedia

2004 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sandra Day O'Connor

The 2004 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 4, 2004, and concluded October 3, 2005. This was the twenty-fourth term of Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's tenure on the Court. Sandra Day O'Connor.jpg
Sandra Day O'Connor 2004 term statistics
8
Majority or Plurality
5
Concurrence
0
Other
6
Dissent
0
Concurrence/dissent Total = 19
Bench opinions = 19 Opinions relating to orders = 0 In-chambers opinions = 0
Unanimous opinions: 4 Most joined by: Breyer (10) Least joined by: Rehnquist, Stevens, Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg (7)
Type Case Citation Issues Joined by Other opinions



Norfolk Southern Ry. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd. 543 U.S. 14 (2004)

Unanimous



Whitfield v. United States 543 U.S. 209 (2005)

Unanimous



Clark v. Martinez 543 U.S. 371 (2005)

Transparent.gif
Scalia
Transparent.gif
Thomas



Johnson v. California 543 U.S. 499 (2005)

Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Transparent.gif
Ginsburg
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Transparent.gif
Thomas



Roper v. Simmons 543 U.S. 551 (2005)

Transparent.gif
Kennedy
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Transparent.gif
Scalia



Shepard v. United States 544 U.S. 13 (2005)

Kennedy, Breyer
Transparent.gif
Souter
Transparent.gif
Thomas



Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education 544 U.S. 167 (2005)

Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Transparent.gif
Thomas



Smith v. City of Jackson 544 U.S. 228 (2005)

Kennedy, Thomas
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Transparent.gif
Scalia



Rhines v. Weber 544 U.S. 269 (2005)

Rehnquist, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Transparent.gif
Souter



Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 544 U.S. 528 (2005)

Unanimous
Transparent.gif
Kennedy



Clingman v. Beaver 544 U.S. 581 (2005)

Breyer (in part)
Transparent.gif
Thomas
Transparent.gif
Stevens



Medellin v. Dretke 544 U.S. 660 (2005)

Stevens, Souter, Breyer
Transparent.gif
per curiam
Transparent.gif
Ginsburg
Transparent.gif
Souter
Transparent.gif
Breyer
O'Connor dissented from the Court's per curiam decision to dismiss certiorari as improvidently granted, arguing that the Court's dismissal was based on speculation as to what the state court might do. O'Connor preferred to remand the case with instructions to consider whether the decision of the ICJ was binding on American courts, and to what extent the Convention created enforceable rights that could not be forfeited through procedural default.



Gonzales v. Raich 545 U.S. 1 (2006)

Commerce Clause  • medical marijuana  • Controlled Substances Act Rehnquist, Thomas (in part)
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Transparent.gif
Scalia
Transparent.gif
Thomas



Bradshaw v. Stumpf 545 U.S. 175 (2005)

Unanimous
Transparent.gif
Souter
Transparent.gif
Thomas



Dodd v. United States 545 U.S. 353 (2005)

Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Transparent.gif
Ginsburg



Rompilla v. Beard 545 U.S. 374 (2005)

Transparent.gif
Souter
Transparent.gif
Kennedy



Kelo v. City of New London 545 U.S. 469 (2005)

Fifth Amendment  • eminent domain Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Transparent.gif
Kennedy
Transparent.gif
Thomas



Van Orden v. Perry 545 U.S. 644 (2005)

First Amendment  • Establishment Clause
Transparent.gif
Rehnquist
Transparent.gif
Scalia
Transparent.gif
Thomas
Transparent.gif
Breyer
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Transparent.gif
Souter



McCreary County v. ACLU 545 U.S. 844 (2005)

First Amendment  • Establishment Clause
Transparent.gif
Souter
Transparent.gif
Scalia

References

  • 2004 Term Opinions of the Court, Supreme Court of the United States, archived from the original on May 16, 2012, retrieved December 16, 2016.
  • 2004 Term Opinions Relating to Orders, Supreme Court of the United States, archived from the original on October 12, 2006, retrieved December 16, 2016.
  • 2004 Term In-Chambers Opinions, Supreme Court of the United States, archived from the original on June 15, 2006, retrieved December 16, 2016.


This article is copied from an article on Wikipedia® - the free encyclopedia created and edited by its online user community. The text was not checked or edited by anyone on our staff. Although the vast majority of Wikipedia® encyclopedia articles provide accurate and timely information, please do not assume the accuracy of any particular article. This article is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License.

Copyright © 2003-2025 Farlex, Inc Disclaimer
All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.